700

• All Discussions
•  Samuel

  707.07 moved to 508.04

   Samuel replied 7 months ago 1 Member · 0 Replies

  700
•  Nicole

  Applicant added new matter to the specification: The addition was not made to claim 1 but indirectly affects it; the new matter directly affects claim 2. What should the examiner do?

  Bryan replied 1 year, 1 month ago 2 Members · 1 Reply

  700
•  Roman

  A non-final Office action dated Friday, November 8, 2012 set a three month shortened statutory period for reply. The practitioner petitioned for a one-month extension of time on Monday, February 10, 2013 and paid the appropriate one-month extension fee. An amendment responsive to the Office action was filed on Tuesday, March 11, 2013. Each independent claim in the application was revised and two dependent claims were cancelled. No claim was added by the amendment. In the Remarks portion of the amendment, the practitioner express his belief that no fees are required by the amendment, but nevertheless authorized charging any necessary fees to the practitioners deposit account, including fees for any required extension of time. A duplicate copy of the amendment was filed. No fees were submitted with the amendment. Assuming a valid deposit account, which of the following statements is in accord with the USPTO rules and the procedures set forth in the MPEP?

   Roman replied 1 year, 9 months ago 1 Member · 0 Replies

  700