<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Wysebridge Patent Bar Academy | Alexander | Activity</title>
	<link>https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/members/akneefelgmail-com/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/members/akneefelgmail-com/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Alexander.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:14:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.7.10</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b8c767237f0fdb9ec4ddb77de5cb61b3</guid>
				<title>Alexander started the discussion Ben hires a registered practitioner to prosecute his patent application. The practitioner drafted an application having fifteen claims. Claim 1 is independent, and each of claims 2-15 are singularly dependent upon claim 1. A proper non-final Office action is mailed to the practitioner. Following consultation with Ben, the practitioner timely prepared, signed, and filed a reply to the Office action containing an amendment that does not add new matter, but does add claims 16-27. Each of claims 16-27 is directed to the same invention sought to be patented through claims 1-15. The dependency of each of claims 16-27 reads “any of claims 5-15.” For purposes of fee calculation in accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP, how many total claims are contained in the application after the amendment is entered? in the forum 600</title>
				<link>https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/forums/forum/practice-questions-and-categories/600-2/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 02:39:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/forums/topic/ben-hires-a-registered-practitioner-to-prosecute-his-patent-application-the-practitioner-drafted-an-application-having-fifteen-claims-claim-1-is-independent-and-each-of-claims-2-15-are-singularly-d/">Ben hires a registered practitioner to prosecute his patent application. The practitioner drafted an application having fifteen claims. Claim 1 is independent, and each of claims 2-15 are singularly dependent upon claim 1. A proper non-final Office action is mailed to the practitioner. Following consultation with Ben, the practitioner timely prepared, signed, and filed a reply to the Office action containing an amendment that does not add new matter, but does add claims 16-27. Each of claims 16-27 is directed to the same invention sought to be patented through claims 1-15. The dependency of each of claims 16-27 reads “any of claims 5-15.” For purposes of fee calculation in accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP, how many total claims are contained in the application after the amendment is entered?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>For the correct answer, where did the 12 come from in the math calculation?</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		<!-- Cache Created By W3speedster Pro at 2026-04-27 13:14:11 in 0.39 secs-->