<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Wysebridge Patent Bar Academy | Man Lung | Activity</title>
	<link>https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/members/desmondmlkwan/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/members/desmondmlkwan/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Man Lung.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:15:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.7.10</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a89aad30afba2ae075af70f3b02cefff</guid>
				<title>Man Lung started the discussion What is the “effectively filed” date for a non-English PCT application publication being applied as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2)? Are there language requirements for applying a published PCT application as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2)? in the forum 1800</title>
				<link>https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/forums/forum/practice-questions-and-categories/1800-2/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:16:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/forums/topic/what-is-the-effectively-filed-date-for-a-non-english-pct-application-publication-being-applied-as-prior-art-under-35-u-s-c-102a2-are-there-language-requirements-for-applying-a/">What is the “effectively filed” date for a non-English PCT application publication being applied as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2)? Are there language requirements for applying a published PCT application as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2)?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I am not sure if D is the correct answer. The written comment seemed to point to answer B.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		<!-- Cache Created By W3speedster Pro at 2026-04-27 13:16:59 in 0.25 secs-->