<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Wysebridge Patent Bar Academy | Nicole | Activity</title>
	<link>https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/members/nsodhi/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/members/nsodhi/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Nicole.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 14:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.7.10</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">be4926ea422458380813cc5989eb96fb</guid>
				<title>Nicole started the discussion Applicant added new matter to the specification: The addition was not made to claim 1 but indirectly affects it; the new matter directly affects claim 2. What should the examiner do? in the forum 700</title>
				<link>https://wysebridge.com/forums/topic/applicant-added-new-matter-to-the-specification-the-addition-was-not-made-to-claim-1-but-indirectly-affects-it-the-new-matter-directly-affects-claim-2-what-should-the-examiner-do/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 18:57:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/forums/topic/applicant-added-new-matter-to-the-specification-the-addition-was-not-made-to-claim-1-but-indirectly-affects-it-the-new-matter-directly-affects-claim-2-what-should-the-examiner-do/">Applicant added new matter to the specification: The addition was not made to claim 1 but indirectly affects it; the new matter directly affects claim 2. What should the examiner do?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>can you explain why you would reject claims 1 &amp; 2?</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		<!-- Cache Created By W3speedster Pro at 2026-04-27 14:52:59 in 0.33 secs-->