<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Wysebridge Patent Bar Academy | Richard | Activity</title>
	<link>https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/members/wmccormick42/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/members/wmccormick42/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Richard.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 14:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.7.10</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">42bcf23d125870945d97d83dfb5ddc9d</guid>
				<title>Richard started the discussion Inventor John receives notice that a PGR was instituted involving his patent and several claims contained in his patent. During the process of review, John decides he wants to amend the claims. Which, if any, is in accordance with the MPEP? in the forum Post Grant Review</title>
				<link>https://wysebridge.com/forums/topic/inventor-john-receives-notice-that-a-pgr-was-instituted-involving-his-patent-and-several-claims-contained-in-his-patent-during-the-process-of-review-john-decides-he-wants-to-amend-the-claims-which/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 01:24:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/forums/topic/inventor-john-receives-notice-that-a-pgr-was-instituted-involving-his-patent-and-several-claims-contained-in-his-patent-during-the-process-of-review-john-decides-he-wants-to-amend-the-claims-which/">Inventor John receives notice that a PGR was instituted involving his patent and several claims contained in his patent. During the process of review, John decides he wants to amend the claims. Which, if any, is in accordance with the MPEP?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Answers B and C are exactly the same, making the question easier.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7d44a05f4274c79be65ecc21e9000a93</guid>
				<title>Richard started the discussion Which of the following definitions does NOT follow proper USPTO rules and the procedures set forth in the MPEP relating to drawings in patent applications? in the forum 1500</title>
				<link>https://wysebridge.com/forums/topic/which-of-the-following-definitions-does-not-follow-proper-uspto-rules-and-the-procedures-set-forth-in-the-mpep-relating-to-drawings-in-patent-applications/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2023 20:32:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://wysebridge.com/patent-bar-academy/forums/topic/which-of-the-following-definitions-does-not-follow-proper-uspto-rules-and-the-procedures-set-forth-in-the-mpep-relating-to-drawings-in-patent-applications/">Which of the following definitions does NOT follow proper USPTO rules and the procedures set forth in the MPEP relating to drawings in patent applications?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Answer B should be accepted. It says &#8220;Photographs and ink drawings may be combined as formal drawings in one application.&#8221; 1503.02 says &#8220;Photographs and ink drawings are not permitted to be combined<br />
as formal drawings in one application.&#8221;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		<!-- Cache Created By W3speedster Pro at 2026-04-27 14:52:05 in 0.31 secs-->