{"id":35389,"date":"2023-08-10T18:08:50","date_gmt":"2023-08-10T18:08:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks\/"},"modified":"2023-08-10T18:08:50","modified_gmt":"2023-08-10T18:08:50","slug":"what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks","title":{"rendered":"What is the difference between doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks?"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the world of intellectual property, there are various concepts and principles that govern the protection of inventions and brands. Two such concepts are the doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks. While both play important roles in safeguarding creativity and innovation, they are applied in distinct ways. Let’s delve into the details and understand the nuances of these concepts.<\/p>\n

Understanding Intellectual Property: Patents and Trademarks<\/h2>\n

Definition of Intellectual Property<\/h3>\n

Intellectual property refers to the legal rights granted to individuals or entities for their intellectual creations. It encompasses a wide range of intangible assets, including inventions, designs, branding elements, and creative works. The purpose of intellectual property is to provide exclusive rights to the creators, encouraging them to continue innovating and contributing to society.<\/p>\n

When it comes to inventions, intellectual property protection is crucial. Patents, for example, grant inventors the exclusive right to use, sell, or license their inventions for a specific period. This protection ensures that inventors can profit from their creations and prevents others from using or exploiting their ideas without permission.<\/p>\n

Similarly, creative works such as literature, music, and art are protected by copyright, which gives the creators the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, and perform their works. This protection allows artists to control how their creations are used and ensures that they are appropriately rewarded for their talent and effort.<\/p>\n

Moreover, intellectual property rights extend to branding elements such as logos, slogans, and trade names. Trademarks provide legal protection to businesses by preventing others from using similar marks that could cause confusion among consumers. This protection allows companies to establish and maintain their brand identity, fostering customer loyalty and trust.<\/p>\n

Importance of Intellectual Property<\/h3>\n

Intellectual property protection plays a vital role in fostering innovation and economic growth. It provides inventors, creators, and businesses with the necessary incentives and rewards for their efforts. By providing legal protection, intellectual property rights encourage investment in research and development, driving progress in various industries.<\/p>\n

For inventors, obtaining a patent not only safeguards their inventions but also allows them to commercialize their ideas. The exclusive rights granted by patents enable inventors to attract investors, secure funding, and bring their inventions to market. This, in turn, stimulates economic activity and creates job opportunities.<\/p>\n

Similarly, copyright protection encourages creativity and the production of original works. By ensuring that creators have control over their creations, copyright law incentivizes artists, musicians, and authors to continue producing new and innovative content. This, in turn, enriches our cultural heritage and contributes to the growth of the creative industries.<\/p>\n

Trademarks, on the other hand, play a crucial role in building brand value and consumer trust. By protecting brand names, logos, and other distinctive elements, trademarks enable businesses to differentiate themselves from competitors. This protection allows companies to establish a strong brand identity, attract customers, and build long-term relationships.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, intellectual property protection fosters international trade and collaboration. By providing a framework for the exchange of ideas, inventions, and creative works, intellectual property rights facilitate technology transfer and knowledge sharing between countries. This exchange of intellectual capital contributes to global innovation and economic development.<\/p>\n

In conclusion, intellectual property is a fundamental aspect of our modern society. It rewards and encourages innovation, creativity, and entrepreneurship. By granting exclusive rights to creators and businesses, intellectual property protection stimulates economic growth, fosters cultural development, and promotes international cooperation.<\/p>\n

An Overview of Patents<\/h2>\n

Welcome to our comprehensive guide on patents! In this article, we will delve into the fascinating world of intellectual property rights and explore the various aspects of patents. So, let’s get started!<\/p>\n

What is a Patent?<\/h3>\n

A patent is not just a piece of paper; it represents a powerful tool that inventors can utilize to protect their innovative ideas. It is a form of intellectual property right granted to inventors for their novel inventions. When an inventor obtains a patent, they are given exclusive rights for a specified period, typically 20 years, allowing them to prevent others from making, using, or selling their invention without permission.<\/p>\n

Imagine you have come up with a groundbreaking invention that could revolutionize an industry. By securing a patent, you gain a legal monopoly over your creation, enabling you to capitalize on your hard work and dedication. This exclusivity provides inventors with the opportunity to monetize their innovations, attracting investors, and potentially generating substantial profits.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, patents serve as a means for inventors to safeguard their ideas from being copied or stolen by competitors. This protection encourages inventors to disclose their inventions to the public, as they can be confident that their intellectual property is shielded from unauthorized use.<\/p>\n

The Role of Patents in Innovation<\/h3>\n

Patents play a pivotal role in fostering innovation and driving technological advancements. By granting inventors exclusive rights, patents incentivize them to invest time, effort, and resources into research and development. Without the promise of exclusivity, inventors may be reluctant to disclose their inventions, fearing that others may replicate their ideas without providing any compensation.<\/p>\n

When inventors are assured of legal protection through patents, they are more inclined to share their knowledge with the world. This dissemination of information leads to a collective advancement in technology and fuels further innovation. Patents act as a catalyst for progress, as they encourage inventors to build upon existing ideas, refine them, and create new inventions that push the boundaries of what is possible.<\/p>\n

Moreover, patents provide inventors with a competitive advantage in the market. With exclusive rights to their inventions, inventors can establish themselves as industry leaders, attracting customers and potential business partners. This advantage not only rewards inventors for their creativity but also encourages healthy competition among companies, spurring continuous innovation.<\/p>\n

In conclusion, patents are a vital component of the modern innovation ecosystem. They protect inventors’ rights, incentivize the disclosure of inventions, and drive technological progress. By understanding the significance of patents, inventors can navigate the intricate world of intellectual property and harness the power of their ideas to shape the future.<\/p>\n

Understanding the Doctrine of Inherency in Patents<\/h2>\n

The doctrine of inherency in patents is a fundamental concept that plays a crucial role in the field of intellectual property. It refers to the idea that certain features or characteristics are inherently present in an invention, even if they are not explicitly mentioned in the patent claims. In other words, if a particular property naturally or necessarily accompanies an invention, it is considered inherent, regardless of whether it is specifically stated in the patent application.<\/p>\n

This doctrine serves as a safeguard to ensure that inventors are not granted overly broad patents for trivial variations of their inventions. By recognizing the inherent aspects of an invention, patent law<\/a> prevents individuals from obtaining exclusive rights to minor modifications or obvious additions that do not significantly contribute to the overall novelty or inventiveness of the original invention.<\/p>\n

Definition of Doctrine of Inherency<\/h3>\n

To delve deeper into the concept of the doctrine of inherency, it is important to understand its definition and implications. As mentioned earlier, this doctrine asserts that an invention may possess certain properties or features that are not explicitly mentioned in the patent claims but are inherently present in the invention itself.<\/p>\n

For instance, imagine a patent that claims a new method of manufacturing a product. If this patent fails to explicitly mention a specific step that is reasonably assumed to be inherent in the manufacturing process, that step is still covered by the patent. This means that even if the patent does not expressly disclose every minute detail, the doctrine of inherency ensures that the inventor is still protected.<\/p>\n

This principle prevents others from exploiting minor variations or omissions in the patent claims to create similar inventions that essentially embody the same inherent features. It upholds the integrity of the patent system by recognizing the inherent nature of certain properties or characteristics that naturally accompany an invention.<\/p>\n

Examples and Applications of Doctrine of Inherency<\/h3>\n

The doctrine of inherency finds numerous applications and can be observed in various patent cases. Let’s explore a few examples to illustrate how this concept operates in practice.<\/p>\n

In a scenario where a patent claims a novel method of producing a chemical compound, but fails to explicitly mention a specific reaction step that is reasonably assumed to be inherent in the process, that step is still considered to be covered by the patent. This is because the step is a natural and necessary part of the overall manufacturing process, even if it is not explicitly stated in the patent claims.<\/p>\n

Moreover, the doctrine of inherency becomes particularly significant when dealing with inventions whose properties may change over time or under different conditions. If certain properties or characteristics arise as a natural result of the invention, they are considered inherent, even if they are not explicitly mentioned in the patent. This ensures that inventors are not unfairly deprived of the protection they deserve due to unforeseen variations in the performance or behavior of their inventions.<\/p>\n

By applying the doctrine of inherency, patent law strikes a balance between providing inventors with the necessary protection for their inventions and preventing the granting of overly broad patents that would stifle innovation and impede progress in various fields.<\/p>\n

In conclusion, the doctrine of inherency in patents is a vital legal principle that recognizes and protects the inherent features and characteristics of an invention, even if they are not explicitly mentioned in the patent claims. It serves as a safeguard against overly broad patents and ensures that inventors are granted the appropriate level of protection for their novel and inventive contributions to society.<\/p>\n

An Overview of Trademarks<\/h2>\n

What is a Trademark?<\/h3>\n

A trademark is a recognizable sign, symbol, word, or phrase that distinguishes goods or services of one source from those of others. It serves as a valuable tool for businesses to establish brand identities and differentiate themselves in the marketplace. By registering a trademark, an entity gains exclusive rights to use that mark in connection with their goods or services, preventing others from using similar marks that may cause confusion among consumers.<\/p>\n

The Role of Trademarks in Branding<\/h3>\n

Trademarks play a vital role in branding by building consumer trust and loyalty. They enable businesses to create unique and recognizable identities, helping consumers make informed purchasing decisions. A well-established trademark can evoke emotions, convey quality, and embody the values associated with a particular brand.<\/p>\n

Understanding Inherent Distinctiveness in Trademarks<\/h2>\n

Definition of Inherent Distinctiveness<\/h3>\n

Inherent distinctiveness refers to the inherent capability of a trademark to immediately indicate the source of goods or services. Trademarks can be categorized into five distinct levels of inherent distinctiveness: arbitrary or fanciful, suggestive, descriptive, generic, and inherently distinctive. The level of inherent distinctiveness determines the strength of protection a trademark receives.<\/p>\n

Examples and Applications of Inherent Distinctiveness<\/h3>\n

Arbitrary or fanciful marks, such as “Apple” for computers and “Nike” for sportswear, have a high level of inherent distinctiveness as they bear no logical or descriptive connection to the goods or services they represent. Suggestive marks, like “Netflix” for streaming services or “Greyhound” for bus travel, require consumers to use their imagination or perception to understand their connection to the products.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, descriptive marks, such as “Best Buy” for electronics or “Sports Illustrated” for sports magazines, describe the goods or services they provide and acquire distinctiveness over time through continuous use and consumer recognition. Generic marks, which are common terms used to identify a particular class of goods or services, cannot be protected as trademarks since they lack inherent distinctiveness.<\/p>\n

In conclusion, while both the doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks relate to intellectual property protection, they serve separate purposes. The doctrine of inherency focuses on the inherent properties of inventions and their implicit coverage, while inherent distinctiveness determines the immediate source identification capability of trademarks. Understanding these concepts is crucial for inventors and brand owners to navigate the complex landscape of intellectual property rights and effectively protect their creations and brand identities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Discover the key distinctions between the doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":35388,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","wds_primary_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[89],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-what-is-the-difference"],"yoast_head":"\nWhat is the difference between doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks? - Wysebridge Patent Bar Review<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What is the difference between doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks? - Wysebridge Patent Bar Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Discover the key distinctions between the doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Wysebridge Patent Bar Review\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/patentbar\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-10T18:08:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-937.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bryan\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Wysebridge\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Wysebridge\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bryan\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bryan\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9ca1b8dbee30cb6cb9d6f16759798921\"},\"headline\":\"What is the difference between doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks?\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-10T18:08:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-10T18:08:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks\"},\"wordCount\":2007,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-937.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"What Is The Difference?\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks\",\"name\":\"What is the difference between doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks? - Wysebridge Patent Bar Review\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-937.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-10T18:08:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-10T18:08:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-937.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-937.png\",\"width\":768,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Two distinct symbols\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"What is the difference between doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/\",\"name\":\"Wysebridge Patent Bar Review\",\"description\":\"Pass the patent bar in half the time\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"The Patent Bar Review\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Wysebridge Patent Bar Review\",\"alternateName\":\"Patent Bar Prep\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Wysebridge-New-Blue-100.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Wysebridge-New-Blue-100.png\",\"width\":100,\"height\":100,\"caption\":\"Wysebridge Patent Bar Review\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/patentbar\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Wysebridge\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/patentbar\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9ca1b8dbee30cb6cb9d6f16759798921\",\"name\":\"Bryan\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2e78cea93383f23086b0cf8968b1972e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2e78cea93383f23086b0cf8968b1972e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bryan\"},\"description\":\"Building.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/author\/bryan\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What is the difference between doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks? - Wysebridge Patent Bar Review","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What is the difference between doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks? - Wysebridge Patent Bar Review","og_description":"Discover the key distinctions between the doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks.","og_url":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks","og_site_name":"Wysebridge Patent Bar Review","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/patentbar\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-10T18:08:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":768,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-937.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Bryan","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Wysebridge","twitter_site":"@Wysebridge","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bryan","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks"},"author":{"name":"Bryan","@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9ca1b8dbee30cb6cb9d6f16759798921"},"headline":"What is the difference between doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks?","datePublished":"2023-08-10T18:08:50+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-10T18:08:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks"},"wordCount":2007,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-937.png","articleSection":["What Is The Difference?"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks","url":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks","name":"What is the difference between doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks? - Wysebridge Patent Bar Review","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-937.png","datePublished":"2023-08-10T18:08:50+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-10T18:08:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-937.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image-937.png","width":768,"height":512,"caption":"Two distinct symbols"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/what-is-the-difference-between-doctrine-of-inherency-in-patents-and-inherent-distinctiveness-in-trademarks#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"What is the difference between doctrine of inherency in patents and inherent distinctiveness in trademarks?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/","name":"Wysebridge Patent Bar Review","description":"Pass the patent bar in half the time","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#organization"},"alternateName":"The Patent Bar Review","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#organization","name":"Wysebridge Patent Bar Review","alternateName":"Patent Bar Prep","url":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Wysebridge-New-Blue-100.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Wysebridge-New-Blue-100.png","width":100,"height":100,"caption":"Wysebridge Patent Bar Review"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/patentbar\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/Wysebridge","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/patentbar"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9ca1b8dbee30cb6cb9d6f16759798921","name":"Bryan","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2e78cea93383f23086b0cf8968b1972e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2e78cea93383f23086b0cf8968b1972e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bryan"},"description":"Building.","url":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/author\/bryan"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35389"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35389\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35388"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wysebridge.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}