Appendix II — S — Decisions Cited — S
Ninth Edition, Revision 01.2024
[ Editor Note: Opinions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board or its predecessor organizations (Board) made available to the public after the Board first published Standard Operating Procedure 2 in 1994 (addressing the publication of Board opinions and the designation of such opinions as precedential) that (1) expressly indicate that the opinion is binding precedent of the Board or (2) are identified as binding precedent on the Board’s Precedential opinion website ( www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/appealing -patent-decisions/decisions-and-opinions/precedential ) are precedential and binding authority. Prior to 1994, a decision by the Board was considered binding on panels of the Board only if the opinion was authorized by the Board to be published. See Ex parte Holt, 19 USPQ2d 1211 (Bd.Pat. App. & Int. 1991).]
Editor Note: When possible, parallel citations to the United States Reports or Federal Reporter and the United States Patent Quarterly (USPQ) are provided and include pinpoint pages, if appropriate. However, decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit published after July 11, 2022, no longer contain a pinpoint page for the USPQ citations.
Sachs v. Wadsworth, 48 F.2d 928, 9 USPQ 252 (CCPA 1931) 715.07
Sage Prods., Inc. v. Devon Indus., Inc., 126 F.3d 1420, 44 USPQ2d 1103 (Fed. Cir. 1997) 2181
Sakraida v. AG Pro, Inc., 425 U.S. 273, 189 USPQ 449 (1976) 716.01(a) , 2141 , 2143
Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC, 64 F.4th 1311, 2023 USPQ2d 412 (Fed. Cir. 2023) 2111.01
Salazar v. Procter & Gamble Co., 414 F.3d 1342, 75 USPQ2d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2005) 1302.14
Salmon, In re, 705 F.2d 1579, 217 USPQ 981 (Fed. Cir. 1983) 1504.04 , 1504.20
Salsbury, Ex parte, 38 USPQ 149 (Comm’r Pat. 1938) 1504.04
Samour, In re, 571 F.2d 559, 197 USPQ 1 (CCPA 1978) 2131.01
Sampson v. Ampex Corp., 463 F.2d 1042, 174 USPQ 417 (2d Cir. 1972) 201.06(d)
Sampson v. Comm’r Pat., 195 USPQ 136 (D.D.C. 1976) 1402
Sampson v. Dann, 466 F. Supp. 965, 201 USPQ 15 (D.D.C. 1978) 1308
Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc., 137 S. Ct. 429, 120 USPQ2d 1749 (2016) 2106.03
Sandwick, Ex parte, Appeal No. 2018-008369 (PTAB July 23, 2019) 1412.01
Sanford, Ex parte, 1914 C.D. 69, 204 O.G. 1346 (Comm’r Pat. 1914) 1504.05
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMbH v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., 66 F.4th 1373, 2023 USPQ2d 552 (Fed. Cir. 2023) 2141.01(a)
Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex,Inc., 550 F.3d 1075, 89 USPQ2d 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2008) 2131.02 , 2142 , 2143
Santarus, Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., 694 F.3d 1344, 104 USPQ2d 1641 (Fed. Cir. 2012) 2133.01
SAP America, Inc. v. InvestPic, LLC, 890 F.3d 1016, 126 USPQ2d 1638 (Fed. Cir. 2018) 2106.04(a)(2)
SAP America, Inc. v. InvestPic, LLC, 898 F.3d 1161, 127 USPQ2d 1597 (Fed. Cir. 2018) 2106.04(a)(2)
Sapp, In re, 324 F.2d 1021, 139 USPQ 552 (CCPA 1963) 1504.03
Sarett, In re, 327 F.2d 1005, 140 USPQ 474 (CCPA 1964) 804
Sarkar, In re, 575 F.2d 870, 197 USPQ 788 (CCPA 1978) 724
Sasajima, Ex parte, 212 USPQ 103 (Bd. App. 1981) 716.02(f)
Sasse, In re, 629 F.2d 675, 207 USPQ 107 (CCPA 1980) 716.07 , 2121 , 2121.02
Saunders, In re, 444 F.2d 599, 170 USPQ 213 (CCPA 1971) 716.02(f) , 2142 , 2172
SawStop Holding LLC v. Vidal, 48 F.4th 1355, 2022 USPQ2d 836 (Fed. Cir. 2022) 2731
Scaltech, Inc. v. Retec/Tetra, L.L.C., 269 F.3d 1321, 60 USPQ2d 1687 (Fed. Cir. 2001) 2133.03(c)
Scarbrough, In re, 500 F.2d 560, 182 USPQ 298 (CCPA 1974) 608.01(p) , 2161.01 , 2164.06(a) , 2164.06(c)
Schaub, In re, 537 F.2d 509, 190 USPQ 324 (CCPA 1976) 715.03
Schaumann, In re, 572 F.2d 312, 197 USPQ 5 (CCPA 1978) 2131.02 , 2144.08 , 2158.01
Schechter, In re, 205 F.2d 185, 98 USPQ 144 (CCPA 1953) 2144.08 , 2144.09 , 2173.05(i)
Scheiber, In re, 587 F.2d 59, 199 USPQ 782 (CCPA 1978) 211.05 , 2163.03
Schenck v. Nortron Corp., 713 F.2d 782, 218 USPQ 698 (Fed. Cir. 1983) 2141.02 , 2144.04
Schering Corp. v. Amgen, Inc., 222 F.3d 1347, 55 USPQ2d 1650 (Fed. Cir. 2000) 2163.07
Schering Corp. v. Geneva Pharm. Inc., 339 F.3d 1373, 67 USPQ2d 1664 (Fed. Cir. 2003) 2112 , 2152.02(b)
Schering-Plough Corp., In re, 1 USPQ2d 1926 (Comm’r Pat. & Tm. 1986) 2760
Scherl, In re, 156 F.2d 72, 74-75, 70 USPQ 204, 205-206 (CCPA 1946) 2144.05
Schlittler, In re, 234 F.2d 882, 110 USPQ 304 (CCPA 1956) 2128.02
Schnell, In re, 46 F.2d 203, 8 USPQ 19 (CCPA 1931) 1504.01
Schneller, In re, 397 F.2d 350, 158 USPQ 210 (CCPA 1968) 804 , 804.01 , 1504.06
Schoenwald, In re, 964 F.2d 1122, 22 USPQ2d 1671 (Fed. Cir. 1992) 2122 , 2152.02(b)
Schreiber, In re, 128 F.3d 1473, 44 USPQ2d 1429 (Fed. Cir. 1997) 2111.02 , 2112 , 2114 , 2141.01(a) , 2173.05(g)
Schulhauser, Ex parte, Appeal 2013-007847 (PTAB April 28, 2016) 2111.04
Schulze, In re, 346 F.2d 600, 145 USPQ 716 (CCPA 1965) 716.01(c) , 2145 , 2164.06(c)
Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc., 82 F.4th 1371, 2023 USPQ2d 1173 (Fed. Cir. 2023) 2145
SciMed Life Sys., Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Sys., Inc., 242 F.3d 1337, 58 USPQ2d 1059 (Fed.Cir. 2001) 2111.01
Scott v. Brandenburger, 216 USPQ 326 (Bd. App. 1982) 2137
Scott v. Finney, 34 F.3d 1058, 32 USPQ2d 1115 (Fed. Cir. 1994) 2107.01 , 2107.03 , 2138.05 , 2164.05
Scott v. Koyama, 281 F.3d 1243, 61 USPQ2d 1856 (Fed. Cir. 2002) 2138.06
Scragg, In re, 215 USPQ 715 (Comm’r Pat. 1982) 2285
Scripps Clinic and Res. Found. v. Genentech, Inc., 927 F.2d 1565, 18 USPQ2d 1001 (Fed. Cir. 1991) 2165.04
Scudder, Ex parte, 169 USPQ 814 (Bd. App. 1971) 1402 , 1412.04
Scully Signal Co. v. Electronics Corp. of America, 570 F.2d 355, 196 USPQ 657 (1st Cir. 1977) 716.04
Seabed Geosolutions (US) Inc. v. Magseis FF LLC, 8 F.4th 1285, 2021 USPQ2d 848 (Fed. Cir. 2021) 2111.01
Seal-Flex, Inc. v. Athletic Track and Court Construction, 172 F.3d 836, 50 USPQ2d 1225 (Fed. Cir. 1999) 2181
Searles, In re, 422 F.2d 431, 164 USPQ 623 (CCPA 1970) 2132.01 , 2274
Seattle Box Co. v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc., 731 F.2d 818, 221 USPQ 568 (Fed. Cir. 1984) 2173.05(b)
Seid, In re, 161 F.2d 229, 73 USPQ 431 (CCPA 1947) 2112.01 , 2144.04
Seiko Epson Corp. v. Nu-Kote Int’l, Inc., 190 F.3d 1360, 52 USPQ2d 1011 (Fed. Cir. 1999) 1504.01(c)
Seiko Koko Kabushiki Kaisha, Ex parte, 225 USPQ 1260 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1984) 2258
Self, In re, 671 F.2d 1344, 213 USPQ 1 (CCPA 1982) 2131.05
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. v. Samsung Electronics Co., 204 F.3d 1368, 54 USPQ2d 1001 (Fed. Cir. 2000) 609.04(a) , 609.05(b) , 2004
Sernaker, In re, 702 F.2d 989, 217 USPQ 1 (Fed. Cir. 1983) 2144
Shaffer Tool Works v. Joy Mfg. Co., 687 F. Supp 80, 167 USPQ 170 (S.D. Tex. 1970) 1701.01
Shatterproof Glass Corp. v. Libbey-Owens Ford Co., 758 F.2d 613, 225 USPQ 634 (Fed. Cir. 1985) 2133.03(b)
Shepherd, In re, 172 F.2d 560, 80 USPQ 495 (CCPA 1949) 716.07
Scherl, In re, 156 F.2d 72, 70 USPQ 204 (CCPA 1946) 2144.05
Sherwood, In re, 613 F.2d 809, 204 USPQ 537 (CCPA 1980) 608.01(h) , 2161.01 , 2165.04
Shell Dev. Co. v. Watson, 149 F. Supp. 279, 113 USPQ 265 (D.D.C. 1957) 2106.03
Shindelar v. Holdeman, 628 F.2d 1337, 207 USPQ 112 (CCPA 1980) 2138.03
Shoes by Firebug LLC v. Stride Rite Children’s Grp., LLC, 962 F.3d 1362, 2020 USPQ2d 10701 (Fed. Cir. 2020) 2111.02
Shokal, In re, 242 F.2d 771, 113 USPQ 283 (CCPA 1957) 715.03
Sichert, In re, 566 F.2d 1154, 196 USPQ 209 (CCPA 1977) 2107.01 , 2107.02 , 2107.03
Signtech USA Ltd. v. Vutek, Inc., 174 F.3d 1352, 50 USPQ2d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 1999) 2181
Silvestri v. Grant, 496 F.2d 593, 181 USPQ 706 (CCPA 1974) 2138.04
Simon, In re, 302 F.2d 737, 133 USPQ 524 (CCPA 1962) 2174
Simpson, Ex parte, 218 USPQ 1020 (Bd. App. 1982) 2173.05(u) , 2175
Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp., 325 U.S. 327, 65 USPQ 297 (1945) 2144.07
SiRF Tech., Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 601 F.3d 1319, 94 USPQ2d 1607 (Fed. Cir. 2010) 2106.04(a)(2)
Sisvel Int’l S.A. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc., 81 F.4th 1231, 2023 USPQ2d 1030 (Fed. Cir. 2023) 2111.01
Sitrick v. Dreamworks, LLC, 516 F.3d 993, 85 USPQ2d 1826 (Fed. Cir. 2008) 2161.01
Sivaramakrishnan, In re, 673 F.2d 1383, 213 USPQ 441 (CCPA 1982) 2131.02
Skil Corp. v. Lucerne Products Inc., 503 F.2d 745, 183 USPQ 396 (7th Cir. 1974) 2133.03(e)
Skil Corp. v. Rockwell Manufacturing Co., 358 F. Supp. 1257, 178 USPQ 562 (N.D. Ill. 1973) 2133.03(e)(3)
Skrivan, In re, 427 F.2d 801, 166 USPQ 85 (CCPA 1970) 2164.08
Skuballa, Ex parte, 12 USPQ2d 1570 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1989) 2173.05(c)
Sinex, In re, 309 F.2d 488, 135 USPQ 302 (CCPA 1962) 2111.02
Slayter, In re, 276 F.2d 408, 125 USPQ 345 (CCPA 1960) 715.03 , 2131.02
Slip Track Systems, Inc. v. Metal Lite, Inc., 159 F.3d 1337, 48 USPQ2d 1055 (Fed. Cir. 1998) 1449.02
SmartGene, Inc. v. Advanced Biological Labs., SA, 555 Fed. App'x. 950 (Fed. Cir. 2014) 2106.04(a)(2)
Smernoff, Ex parte, 215 USPQ 545 (Bd. App. 1982) 2109
Smith, Ex parte, 83 USPQ2d 1509 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 2007) 2143
Smith, In re, 77 F. 2d 513, 25 USPQ 359, 1935 C.D. 565 (CCPA 1935) 1504.01(d)
Smith, In re, 77 F.2d 514, 25 USPQ 360, 1935 C.D. 573 (CCPA 1935) 1504.01(d)
Smith, In re, 458 F.2d 1389, 173 USPQ 679 (CCPA 1972) 2163 , 2163.05
Smith, In re, 714 F.2d 1127, 218 USPQ 976 (Fed. Cir. 1983) 2133.03(a) , 2133.03(e)
Smith, In re, 815 F.3d 816, 118 USPQ2d 1245 (Fed. Cir. 2016) 2106.04(a)(2) , 2106.05(d) , 2106.07(a)
Smith v. Hayashi, 209 USPQ 754 (Bd. of Pat. Inter. 1980) 2144.06
Smith v. M & B Sales & Mfg., 13 USPQ2d 2002 (N.D. Cal. 1990) 1504.01(c)
Smith v. Nichols, 88 U.S. 112 (1874) 2144.05
Smith & Davis Mfg. Co. v. Mellon, 58 F. 705 (8th Cir. 1893) 2133.03(e)(6)
SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp., 403 F.3d 1331, 74 USPQ2d 1398 (Fed. Cir. 2005) 2112
Smyth, In re, 189 F.2d 982, 90 USPQ 106 (CCPA 1951) 716.09
Smythe, In re, 480 F.2d 1376, 178 USPQ 279 (CCPA 1973) 2163 , 2163.05 , 2163.07(a)
Sneed, In re, 710 F.2d 1544, 218 USPQ 385 (Fed. Cir. 1983) 1445 , 2145
SNIPR Techs. LTD v. Rockefeller Univ., 72 F.4th 1372, 2023 USPQ2d 827 (Fed. Cir. 2023) 2159.03
Sobin, Ex parte, 139 USPQ 528 (Bd. App. 1962) 2173.05(t)
Soli, In re, 317 F.2d 941, 137 USPQ 797 (CCPA 1963) 2144.02 , 2144.03
Soll, In re, 97 F.2d 623, 38 USPQ 189 (CCPA 1938) 2164.03
Solomon v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 216 F.3d 1372, 55 USPQ2d 1279 (Fed. Cir. 2000) 2172 , 2173.02
Solutran, Inc. v. Elavon, Inc., 931 F.3d 1161, 2019 USPQ2d 281076 (Fed. Cir. 2019) 2106.04(d)
Soni, In re, 54 F.3d 746, 34 USPQ2d 1684 (Fed. Cir. 1995) 707.07(f) , 2145
Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. v. Dudas, 85 USPQ2d 1594 (E.D. Va. 2006) 2240
Sorenson, Ex parte, 3 USPQ2d 1462 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1987) 2163.05
Spada, In re, 911 F.2d 705, 15 USPQ2d 1655 (Fed. Cir. 1990) 2112.01 , 2182
Spectra-Physics, Inc. v. Coherent, Inc., 827 F.2d 1524, 3 USPQ2d 1737 (Fed. Cir. 1987) 608.01(h) , 2161.01 , 2164.01(b) , 2165.02 , 2165.04
Spencer, In re, 273 F.2d 181, 124 USPQ 175 (CCPA 1959) 1449.02
Spiegel, Ex parte, 1919 C.D. 112, 268 O.G. 741 (Comm’r Pat. 1919) 1503.01
Spiller, In re, 500 F.2d 1170, 182 USPQ 614 (CCPA 1974) 715.02 , 715.03
Sponnoble, In re, 405 F.2d 578, 160 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1969) 2141.02
Sport Dimension, Inc. v. Coleman Co. Inc., 820 F.3d 1316, 118 USPQ2d 1607 (Fed. Cir. 2016) 1504.02
SRI Int'l, Inc. v. Internet Sec. Sys., Inc., 511 F.3d 1186, 85 USPQ2d 1489 (Fed. Cir. 2008) 2152.02(e)
Staats, In re, 671 F.3d 1350, 101 USPQ2d 1930 (Fed. Cir. 2012) 1412.03
Staeger v. Commissioner, 189 USPQ 272 (D.D.C. 1976) 409.03(b) , 602.08(b)
Staehelin v. Secher, 24 USPQ2d 1513 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1992) 2109
Stalego, Ex parte, 154 USPQ 52 (Bd. App. 1966) 901.01 , 2127 , 2136.02
Standard Oil Co. v. Montedison, S.p.A., 494 F. Supp 370, 206 USPQ 676 (D.Del. 1980) 2165.01
Standish, Ex parte, 10 USPQ2d 1454 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1988) 716.03(a) , 716.03(b) , 2138.01
Stanley, Ex parte, 121 USPQ 621 (Bd. App. 1958) 2181
Star Fruits S.N.C. v. United States, 280 F.Supp.2d 512 (E.D. Va 2003) 704.12(a) , 2005
Star Fruits S.N.C. v. United States, 61393 F.3d 1277, 73 USPQ2d 1409 (Fed. Cir. 2005) 704.10 , 2005
Starhome GmbH v. AT&T Mobility LLC, 743 F.3d 849, 109 USPQ2d 1885 (Fed. Cir. 2014) 2111.01
State Contracting & Eng’g Corp. v. Condotte America, Inc., 346 F.3d 1057, 68 USPQ2d 1481 (Fed. Cir. 2003) 2131.05 , 2141.01(a)
State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Fin. Grp., 149 F.3d 1368, 47 USPQ2d 1596 (Fed. Cir. 1998) 2106
Steed, In re, 802 F.3d 1311, 116 USPQ2d 1760 (Fed. Cir. 2015) 715.07 , 715.07(a)
Steele, In re, 305 F.2d 859, 134 USPQ 292 (CCPA 1962) 2143.03 , 2173.06
Steenbock, In re, 83 F.2d 912, 30 USPQ 45 (CCPA 1936) 211.05
Steierman v. Connelly, 192 USPQ 433 (Bd. Pat. Int. 1975) 2004
Steierman v. Connelly, 192 USPQ 446 (Bd. Pat. Int. 1976) 2004
Steierman v. Connelly, 197 USPQ 288 (Comm’r Pat. 1976) 2138.03
Steigerwald, Ex parte, 131 USPQ 74 (Bd. App. 1961) 2173.05(d) , 2175
Steinberg v. Seitz, 517 F.2d 1359, 186 USPQ 209 (CCPA 1975) 2133.03(c)
Stemniski, In re, 444 F.2d 581, 170 USPQ 343 (CCPA 1971) 2144.08 , 2144.09
Stempel, In re, 241 F.2d 755, 113 USPQ 77 (CCPA 1957) 715.03
Stencel, In re, 828 F.2d 751, 4 USPQ2d 1071 (Fed. Cir. 1987) 2111.02
Stepan, In re, 868 F.3d 1342, 123 USPQ2d 1838 (Fed. Cir. 2017) 2144.05
Steppan, In re, 394 F.2d 1013, 156 USPQ 143 (CCPA 1967) 2173.05(o)
Stern, Ex parte, 13 USPQ2d 1379 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1987) 2144.04
Stevens, Ex parte, 16 USPQ2d 1379 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1990) 2107.03
Stevens, In re, 173 F.2d 1015, 81 USPQ 362 (CCPA 1949) 1504.01(c)
Stevens, In re, 212 F.2d 197, 101 USPQ 284 (CCPA 1954) 2144.04
Stevenson v. International Trade Comm’n, 612 F.2d 546, 204 USPQ 276 (CCPA 1979) 2141.01(a)
Stewart Sys. v. Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, 1 USPQ2d 1879 (E.D. Va. 1986) 2258
Sticker Indus. Supply Corp. v. Blaw-Knox Co., 405 F.2d 90, 160 USPQ 177 (7th Cir. 1968) 201.06(d) , 211.01(b)
Stoddard, In re, 213 USPQ 386 (Comm’r Pat. 1982) 2285
Stored Value Solutions, Inc. v. Card Activation Technologies, 499 Fed.App’x 5 (Fed. Cir. 2012) 2163
Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corp., 713 F.2d 1530, 218 USPQ 871 (Fed. Cir. 1983) 716.01(a) , 2141 , 2141.01(a) , 2141.02 , 2144.08
Strijland, Ex parte, 26 USPQ2d 1259 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1992) 1503.01 , 1504.01(a) , 1504.04
Striker, In re, 182 USPQ 507 (Comm’r Pat. 1973) 409.03(b) , 602.08(b)
Strong v. General Electric Co., 434 F.2d 1042, 168 USPQ 8 (5th Cir. 1970) 2012 , 2016 , 2133.03(b)
Stryker, In re, 435 F.2d 1340, 168 USPQ 372 (CCPA 1971) 715.02
Studiengesellschaft Kohle m.b.H. v. Northern Petrochemical Co., 784 F.2d 351, 228 USPQ 837 (Fed. Cir. 1986) 804.01 , 804.04
Studiengesellschaft Kohle m.b.H. v. Shell Oil Co., 112 F.3d 1561, 42 USPQ2d 1674 (Fed. Cir. 1997) 211.05 , 2133.01 , 2146.03(a)
STX LLC. v. Brine, 211 F.3d 588, 54 USPQ2d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2000) 2111.02 , 2133.03(c)
Suffolk Tech v. AOL and Google, 752 F.3d 1358, 110 USPQ2d 2034 (Fed. Cir. 2014) 2128
Suh v. Hoefle, 23 USPQ2d 1321 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1992) 2138.05
Suitco Surface, Inc., In re, 603 F.3d 1255, 94 USPQ2d 1640 (Fed. Cir. 2010) 2111 , 2111.01 , 2173.01
Sullivan, In re, 498 F.3d 1345, 84 USPQ2d 1034 (Fed. Cir. 2007) 2145
Sundance, Inc. v. DeMonte Fabricating Ltd., 550 F.3d 1356, 89 USPQ2d 1535 (Fed. Cir. 2008) 2143
Sun Pharm. Indus., Ltd. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 611 F.3d 1381, 95 USPQ2d 1797 (Fed. Cir. 2010) 804
Sunoco Partners Mktg. & Terminals LP v. U.S. Venture, Inc., 32 F.4th 1161, 2022 USPQ2d 417 (Fed. Cir. 2022) 2133.03(e)(1) , 2133.03(e)(2)
Sunrace Roots Enter. Co. v. SRAM Corp., 336 F.3d 1298, 67 USPQ2d 1438 (Fed. Cir. 2003) 2111.01
Sun Studs v. ATA Equipment Leasing, Inc., 872 F.2d 978, 10 USPQ2d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 1989) 2136.02 , 2136.03
Superguide Corp. v. Direct TV Enterprises, Inc., 358 F.3d 870, 69 USPQ2d 1865 (Fed. Cir. 2004) 2111.01
Superior Fireplace Co. v. The Majestic Products Co., 270 F.3d 1358, 60 USPQ2d 1668 (Fed. Cir. 2001) 1481
Supernus Pharm., Inc. v. Iancu, 913 F.3d 1351, 129 USPQ2d 1240 (Fed. Cir. 2019) 2732
SurgiSil, L.L.P., In re, 14 F.4th 1380, 2021 USPQ2d 1008 (Fed. Cir. 2021) 1502 , 1504.02
Sus, In re, 306 F.2d 494, 134 USPQ 301 (CCPA 1962) 2163 , 2163.05
Susi, In re, 440 F.2d 442, 169 USPQ 423 (CCPA 1971) 2123 , 2144.08
Suska, In re, 589 F.2d 527, 200 USPQ 497 (CCPA 1979) 2138.03
Swanson, In re, 540 F.3d 1368, 88 USPQ 2d 1196 (Fed. Cir. 2008) 2242 , 2286 , 2816
Swartz, In re, 232 F.3d 862, 56 USPQ2d 1703 (Fed. Cir. 2000) 2107.01 , 2164.07
Sweet, In re, 136 F.2d 722, 58 USPQ 327 (CCPA 1943) 1211.02
Swett, In re, 541 F.2d 631, 172 USPQ 72 (CCPA 1971) 1504.06
Swinehart, In re, 439 F.2d 210, 169 USPQ 226 (CCPA 1971) 2114 , 2161.01 , 2173.01 , 2173.05(g) , 2183
Switzer, In re, 166 F.2d 827, 77 USPQ 156 (CCPA 1948) 901.02
Switzer v. Sockman, 333 F.2d 935, 142 USPQ 226 (CCPA 1964) 1403 , 1412.03 , 2304.02(c)
Sylgab Steel & Wire Corp. v. Imoco-Gateway Corp., 357 F. Supp 657, 178 USPQ 22 (N.D. Ill. 1973) 2165.01
Symbol Tech. Inc. v. Lemelson Med., Educ., & Research Found., 422 F.3d 1378, 76 USPQ2d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2005) 2190
Symbol Techs., Inc. v. Opticon Inc., 935 F.2d 1569, 19 USPQ2d 1241 (Fed. Cir. 1991) 804.01 , 804.02 , 804.04 , 2121.01 , 2158
Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corp., 839 F.3d 1138, 120 USPQ2d 1473 (Fed. Cir. 2016) 2106 , 2106.04 , 2106.04(a) , 2106.04(a)(2) , 2106.05 , 2106.05(a) , 2106.07(b)
Cited authority
- 715.07 Facts and Documentary Evidence
- 2181 Identifying and Interpreting a 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, Sixth Paragraph Limitation
- 716.01(a) Objective Evidence of Nonobviousness
- 2141 Examination Guidelines for Determining Obviousness Under 35 U.S.C. 103
- 2143 Examples of Basic Requirements of a Prima Facie Case of Obviousness
- 2111.01 Plain Meaning
- 1302.14 Reasons for Allowance
- 1504.04 Considerations Under 35 U.S.C. 112
- 1504.20 Benefit Under 35 U.S.C. 120
- 2131.01 Multiple Reference 35 U.S.C. 102 Rejections
- 201.06(d) 37 CFR 1.53(d) Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) Practice
- 1402 Grounds for Filing
- 1308 Withdrawal From Issue
- 2106.03 Eligibility Step 1: The Four Categories of Statutory Subject Matter
- 1412.01 Reissue Claims Must Be for Same General Invention
- 1504.05 Restriction
- 2141.01(a) Analogous and Nonanalogous Art
- 2131.02 Genus-Species Situations
- 2142 Legal Concept of Prima Facie Obviousness
- 2133.01 Rejections of Continuation-In-Part (CIP) Applications
- 2106.04(a)(2) Abstract Idea Groupings
- 1504.03 Nonobviousness
- 804 Definition of Double Patenting
- 724 Trade Secret, Proprietary, and Protective Order Materials
- 716.02(f) Advantages Disclosed or Inherent
- 716.07 Inoperability of References
- 2121 Prior Art; General Level of Operability Required to Make a Prima Facie Case
- 2121.02 Compounds and Compositions — What Constitutes Enabling Prior Art
- 2172 Subject Matter Which the Inventor or a Joint Inventor Regards as The Invention
- 2731 Period of Adjustment
- 2133.03(c) The “Invention”
- 608.01(p) Completeness of Specification
- 2161.01 Computer Programming, Computer Implemented Inventions, and 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, First Paragraph
- 2164.06(a) Examples of Enablement Issues-Missing Information
- 2164.06(c) Examples of Enablement Issues – Computer Programming Cases
- 715.03 Genus-Species, Practice Relative to Cases Where Predictability Is in Question
- 2144.08 Obviousness of Species When Prior Art Teaches Genus
- 2158.01 Form Paragraphs for Use in Rejections Under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103
- 2144.09 Close Structural Similarity Between Chemical Compounds (Homologs, Analogues, Isomers)
- 2173.05(i) Negative Limitations
- 211.05 Sufficiency of Disclosure in Prior-Filed Application
- 2163.03 Typical Circumstances Where Adequate Written Description Issue Arises
- 2141.02 Differences Between Prior Art and Claimed Invention
- 2144.04 Legal Precedent as Source of Supporting Rationale
- 2163.07 Amendments to Application Which Are Supported in the Original Description
- 2112 Requirements of Rejection Based on Inherency; Burden of Proof
- 2152.02(b) Described in a Printed Publication
- 2760 Trade Secret, Confidential, and Protective Order Material
- 2144.05 Obviousness of Similar and Overlapping Ranges, Amounts, and Proportions
- 2128.02 Date Publication Is Available as a Reference
- 1504.01 Statutory Subject Matter for Designs
- 804.01 Prohibition of Nonstatutory Double Patenting Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. 121
- 1504.06 Double Patenting
- 2122 Discussion of Utility in the Prior Art
- 2111.02 Effect of Preamble
- 2114 Apparatus and Article Claims — Functional Language
- 2173.05(g) Functional Limitations
- 2111.04 “Adapted to,” “Adapted for,” “Wherein,” “Whereby,” and Contingent Clauses
- 716.01(c) Probative Value of Objective Evidence
- 2145 Consideration of Applicant’s Rebuttal Arguments and Evidence
- 2137 Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(f)
- 2107.01 General Principles Governing Utility Rejections
- 2107.03 Special Considerations for Asserted Therapeutic or Pharmacological Utilities
- 2138.05 “Reduction to Practice”
- 2164.05 Determination of Enablement Based on Evidence as a Whole
- 2138.06 “Reasonable Diligence”
- 2285 Copending Ex Parte Reexamination and Reissue Proceedings
- 2165.04 Examples of Evidence of Concealment
- 1412.04 Correction of Inventorship By Reissue
- 716.04 Long-Felt Need and Failure of Others
- 2132.01 Overcoming a Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) Rejection based on a Printed Publication or Patent
- 2274 Appeal Brief
- 2173.05(b) Relative Terminology
- 2112.01 Composition, Product, and Apparatus Claims
- 1504.01(c) Lack of Ornamentality
- 2258 Scope of Ex Parte Reexamination
- 2131.05 Nonanalogous or Disparaging Prior Art
- 609.04(a) Content Requirements for an Information Disclosure Statement
- 609.05(b) Complying Information Disclosure Statements
- 2004 Aids to Compliance With Duty of Disclosure
- 2144 Supporting a Rejection Under 35 U.S.C. 103
- 1701.01 Office Personnel Not To Testify
- 2133.03(b) “On Sale”
- 608.01(h) Mode of Operation of Invention
- 2138.03 “By Another Who Has Not Abandoned, Suppressed, or Concealed It”
- 2107.02 Procedural Considerations Related to Rejections for Lack of Utility
- 2138.04 “Conception”
- 2174 Relationship Between the Requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, First and Second Paragraphs
- 2173.05(u) Trademarks or Trade Names in a Claim
- 2175 Form Paragraphs for Use in Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, Second Paragraph
- 2144.07 Art Recognized Suitability for an Intended Purpose
- 2106.04(a)(1) Examples of Claims That Do Not Recite Abstract Ideas
- 2133.03(e) Permitted Activity; Experimental Use
- 2133.03(e)(3) “Completeness” of the Invention
- 2164.08 Enablement Commensurate in Scope With the Claims
- 2173.05(c) Numerical Ranges and Amounts Limitations
- 1449.02 Interference in Reissue
- 2109 Inventorship
- 1504.01(d) Simulation
- 2163 Guidelines for the Examination of Patent Applications Under the 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, “Written Description” Requirement
- 2163.05 Changes to the Scope of Claims
- 2133.03(a) “Public Use”
- 2106.05(d) Well-Understood, Routine, Conventional Activity
- 2106.07(a) Formulating a Rejection For Lack of Subject Matter Eligibility
- 2144.06 Art Recognized Equivalence for the Same Purpose
- 2133.03(e)(6) Permitted Experimental Activity and Testing
- 716.09 Sufficiency of Disclosure
- 2163.07(a) Inherent Function, Theory, or Advantage
- 1445 Reissue Application Examined in Same Manner as Original Application
- 2159.03 Applications Subject to the AIA but Also Containing a Claimed Invention Having an Effective Filing Date Before March 16, 2013
- 2173.05(t) Chemical Formula
- 2144.02 Reliance on Scientific Theory
- 2144.03 Reliance on Common Knowledge in the Art or “Well Known” Prior Art
- 2164.03 Relationship of Predictability of the Art and the Enablement Requirement
- 2173.02 Determining Whether Claim Language is Definite
- 2106.04(d) Integration of a Judicial Exception Into A Practical Application
- 707.07(f) Answer All Material Traversed
- 2240 Decision on Request Filed under 35 U.S.C. 302
- 2182 Search and Identification of the Prior Art
- 2164.01(b) How to Make the Claimed Invention
- 2165.02 Best Mode Requirement Compared to Enablement Requirement
- 1503.01 Specification
- 715.02 How Much of the Claimed Invention Must Be Shown, Including the General Rule as to Generic Claims
- 1504.02 Novelty
- 2152.02(e) Otherwise Available to the Public
- 1412.03 Broadening Reissue Claims
- 409.03(b) No Inventor Available
- 602.08(b) Inventor Signature and Name
- 901.01 Canceled Matter in U.S. Patent Files
- 2127 Domestic and Foreign Patent Applications as Prior Art
- 2136.02 Content of the Prior Art Available Against the Claims
- 2165.01 Considerations Relevant to Best Mode
- 716.03(a) Commercial Success Commensurate in Scope With Claimed Invention
- 716.03(b) Commercial Success Derived From Claimed Invention
- 2138.01 Interference Practice
- 704.12(a) Relationship of Requirement for Information to Duty of Disclosure
- 2005 Comparison to Requirements for Information
- 704.10 Requirements for Information
- 2106 Patent Subject Matter Eligibility
- 715.07(a) Diligence
- 2143.03 All Claim Limitations Must Be Considered
- 2173.06 Practice Compact Prosecution
- 2173.05(d) Exemplary Claim Language (“for example,” “such as”)
- 2173.05(o) Double Inclusion
- 211.01(b) Claiming the Benefit of a Nonprovisional Application
- Title Page Title Page
- 2012 Reissue Applications Involving Issues of Fraud, Inequitable Conduct, and/or Violation of Duty of Disclosure
- 2016 Fraud, Inequitable Conduct, or Violation of Duty of Disclosure Affects All Claims
- 804.04 Submission to Technology Center Director
- 2146.03(a) Provisional Rejection (Obviousness) Under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) Using Provisional Prior Art Under Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e)
- 2128 “Printed Publications” as Prior Art
- 2111 Claim Interpretation; Broadest Reasonable Interpretation
- 2173.01 Interpreting the Claims
- 2133.03(e)(1) Commercial Exploitation
- 2133.03(e)(2) Intent
- 2136.03 Critical Reference Date
- 1481 Certificates of Correction - Applicant’s Mistake
- 2732 Reduction of Period of Adjustment of Patent Term
- 1502 Definition of a Design
- 2123 Rejection Over Prior Art’s Broad Disclosure Instead of Preferred Embodiments
- 2242 Criteria for Deciding Request Filed under 35 U.S.C. 302
- 2286 Ex Parte Reexamination and Litigation Proceedings
- 2816 Determination on the Request
- 2164.07 Relationship of Enablement Requirement to Utility Requirement of 35 U.S.C. 101
- 1211.02 Remand To Consider Amendment
- 2183 Making a Prima Facie Case of Equivalence
- 901.02 Abandoned Applications
- 1403 Diligence in Filing
- 2304.02(c) Explaining Priority
- 2190 Prosecution Laches and Res Judicata
- 804.02 Avoiding a Double Patenting Rejection
- 2121.01 Use of Prior Art in Rejections Where Operability is in Question
- 2158 AIA 35 U.S.C. 103
- 2106.04 Eligibility Step 2A: Whether a Claim is Directed to a Judicial Exception
- 2106.04(a) Abstract Ideas
- 2106.05 Eligibility Step 2B: Whether a Claim Amounts to Significantly More
- 2106.05(a) Improvements to the Functioning of a Computer or To Any Other Technology or Technical Field
- 2106.07(b) Evaluating Applicant’s Response