Appendix II — V — Decisions Cited — V
Ninth Edition, Revision 01.2024
[ Editor Note: Opinions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board or its predecessor organizations (Board) made available to the public after the Board first published Standard Operating Procedure 2 in 1994 (addressing the publication of Board opinions and the designation of such opinions as precedential) that (1) expressly indicate that the opinion is binding precedent of the Board or (2) are identified as binding precedent on the Board’s Precedential opinion website ( www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/appealing -patent-decisions/decisions-and-opinions/precedential ) are precedential and binding authority. Prior to 1994, a decision by the Board was considered binding on panels of the Board only if the opinion was authorized by the Board to be published. See Ex parte Holt, 19 USPQ2d 1211 (Bd.Pat. App. & Int. 1991).]
Editor Note: When possible, parallel citations to the United States Reports or Federal Reporter and the United States Patent Quarterly (USPQ) are provided and include pinpoint pages, if appropriate. However, decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit published after July 11, 2022, no longer contain a pinpoint page for the USPQ citations.
Vaeck, In re, 947 F.2d 488, 20 USPQ2d 1438 (Fed. Cir. 1991) 2107.01 , 2144.08 , 2164.01 , 2164.01(c) , 2164.03 , 2164.06(b) , 2164.08
Valmont Industries, Inc. v. Reinke Manufacturing Co., 983 F.2d 1039, 25 USPQ2d 1451 (Fed. Cir. 1993) 2183 , 2184 , 2186
Valve Corp. v. Ironburg Inventions Ltd., 8 F.4th 1364, 2021 USPQ2d 867 (Fed. Cir. 2021) 2128
Vamco Machine and Tool, Inc., In re, 752 F.2d 1564, 224 USPQ 617 (Fed. Cir. 1985) 716.03(b)
Vandenberg v. Dairy Equipment Co., 740 F.2d 1560, 224 USPQ 195 (Fed. Cir. 1984) 716.06
Vander Wal, Ex parte, 109 USPQ 119, 1956 C.D. 11, 705 O.G. 5 (Bd. Pat. App. 1955) 608.04(a)
Van Esdonk, In re, 187 USPQ 671 (Comm’r Pat. 1975) 216.01
Van Geuns, In re, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993) 707.07(f) , 2145
Van Langenhoven, In re, 458 F.2d 132, 173 USPQ 426 (CCPA 1972) 211.05 , 2004 , 2135.01 , 2152.02(b) , 2217 , 2258
Vanmoor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc ., 201 F.3d 1363, 53 USPQ2d 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2000) 2133.03(c)
Van Ornum, In re, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982) 804 , 804.02 , 1504.06
Van Os, In re, 844 F.3d 1359, 121 USPQ2d 1209 (Fed. Cir. 2017) 2143 , 2144.03 , 2144.05
Varga, Ex Parte, 189 USPQ 209 (Bd. App. 1973) 2012.01
Varma, In re, 816 F.3d 1352, 118 USPQ2d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2016) 2111.01
Vas-Cath, Inc. v. Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555, 19 USPQ2d 1111 (Fed. Cir. 1991) 608.04(a) , 1504.20 , 2152.02(b) , 2161 , 2161.01 , 2163 , 2163.02 , 2164 , 2181
Vasudevan Software, Inc. v. MicroStrategy, Inc., 782 F.3d 671, 114 USPQ2d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2015) 2161 , 2161.01
Vectra Fitness Inc. v. TNWK Corp., 162 F.3d 1379, 49 USPQ2d 1144 (Fed. Cir. 1998) 1412.03
Venezia, In re, 530 F.2d 956, 189 USPQ 149 (CCPA 1976) 2163 , 2163.05 , 2172.01 , 2173.05(g)
Venner, In re, 262 F.2d 91, 120 USPQ 193 (CCPA 1958) 2114 , 2144.04
Verdegaal Bros. v. Union Oil Co. of California, 814 F.2d 628, 2 USPQ2d 1051 (Fed. Cir. 1987) 2131
VerHoef, In re, 888 F.3d 1362, 126 F.2d 1561 (Fed. Cir. 2018) 2137 , 2138.04
Versata Dev. Group v. SAP Am., Inc., 793 F.3d 1306, 115 USPQ2d 1681 (Fed. Cir. 2015) 2106.04(a)(2) , 2106.05(a) , 2106.05(b) , 2106.05(d) , 2106.05(f) , 2106.07(a)
Vickers, In re, 141 F.2d 522, 61 USPQ 122 (CCPA 1944) 2164.03
Visual Memory LLC. v. NVIDIA Corp., 867 F.3d 1253, 123 USPQ2d 1712 (Fed. Cir. 2017) 2106.04(a) , 2106.05(a)
Vitronics Corp. v. Conceptronic Inc., 90 F.3d 1576, 39 USPQ2d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1996) 2111.01
Vogel, In re, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970) 804 , 804.01 , 804.02 , 1504.06
Voter Verified, Inc. v. Premier Election Solutions, Inc., 698 F.3d 1374, 104 USPQ2d 1553 (Fed. Cir. 2012) 2128 , 2128.01 , 2152.02(e)
Volvo Penta of the Americas, LLC v. Brunswick Corp., 81 F.4th 1202, 2023 USPQ2d 1000 (Fed. Cir. 2023) 716.01(b) , 716.01(d) , 2145
Cited authority
- 2107.01 General Principles Governing Utility Rejections
- 2144.08 Obviousness of Species When Prior Art Teaches Genus
- 2164.01 Test of Enablement
- 2164.01(c) How to Use the Claimed Invention
- 2164.03 Relationship of Predictability of the Art and the Enablement Requirement
- 2164.06(b) Examples of Enablement Issues — Biological and Chemical Cases
- 2164.08 Enablement Commensurate in Scope With the Claims
- 2183 Making a Prima Facie Case of Equivalence
- 2184 Determining Whether an Applicant Has Met the Burden of Proving Nonequivalence After a Prima Facie Case Is Made
- 2186 Relationship to the Doctrine of Equivalents
- 2128 “Printed Publications” as Prior Art
- 716.03(b) Commercial Success Derived From Claimed Invention
- 716.06 Copying
- 608.04(a) Matter Not Present in Specification, Claims, or Drawings on the Application Filing Date
- 216.01 Perfecting Claim for Priority Under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) or (f) After Issuance of a Patent
- 707.07(f) Answer All Material Traversed
- 2145 Consideration of Applicant’s Rebuttal Arguments and Evidence
- 211.05 Sufficiency of Disclosure in Prior-Filed Application
- 2004 Aids to Compliance With Duty of Disclosure
- 2135.01 The Four Requirements of Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d)
- 2152.02(b) Described in a Printed Publication
- 2217 Statement Applying Prior Art in a Request Filed under 35 U.S.C. 302
- 2258 Scope of Ex Parte Reexamination
- 2133.03(c) The “Invention”
- 804 Definition of Double Patenting
- 804.02 Avoiding a Double Patenting Rejection
- 1504.06 Double Patenting
- 2143 Examples of Basic Requirements of a Prima Facie Case of Obviousness
- 2144.03 Reliance on Common Knowledge in the Art or “Well Known” Prior Art
- 2144.05 Obviousness of Similar and Overlapping Ranges, Amounts, and Proportions
- 2012.01 Collateral Estoppel
- 2111.01 Plain Meaning
- 1504.20 Benefit Under 35 U.S.C. 120
- 2161 Three Separate Requirements for Specification Under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, First Paragraph
- 2161.01 Computer Programming, Computer Implemented Inventions, and 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, First Paragraph
- 2163 Guidelines for the Examination of Patent Applications Under the 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, “Written Description” Requirement
- 2163.02 Standard for Determining Compliance With the Written Description Requirement
- 2164 The Enablement Requirement
- 2181 Identifying and Interpreting a 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, Sixth Paragraph Limitation
- 1412.03 Broadening Reissue Claims
- 2163.05 Changes to the Scope of Claims
- 2172.01 Unclaimed Essential Subject Matter
- 2173.05(g) Functional Limitations
- 2114 Apparatus and Article Claims — Functional Language
- 2144.04 Legal Precedent as Source of Supporting Rationale
- 2131 Anticipation — Application of 35 U.S.C. 102
- 2137 Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(f)
- 2138.04 “Conception”
- 2106.04(a)(1) Examples of Claims That Do Not Recite Abstract Ideas
- 2106.05(a) Improvements to the Functioning of a Computer or To Any Other Technology or Technical Field
- 2106.05(b) Particular Machine
- 2106.05(d) Well-Understood, Routine, Conventional Activity
- 2106.05(f) Mere Instructions To Apply An Exception
- 2106.07(a) Formulating a Rejection For Lack of Subject Matter Eligibility
- 2106.04(a) Abstract Ideas
- 804.01 Prohibition of Nonstatutory Double Patenting Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. 121
- 2128.01 Level of Public Accessibility Required
- 2152.02(e) Otherwise Available to the Public
- 716.01(b) Nexus Requirement and Evidence of Nonobviousness
- 716.01(d) Weighing Objective Evidence