Passing the patent bar gets you registered. Practice gets you ready.
Work a realistic invention from the first inventor call to a mock patent application, with feedback on every step. Learn the thinking of a patent practitioner, not just the rules.
RG-001 · Adaptive Robotic Gripper · synthetic case
InventorIt measures grip force and gets better at handling new objects with experience.
YouHas anyone outside the company seen how it works?
InventorWe posted pitch slides publicly about two weeks before filing.
Fact uncovered: earlier public disclosure3 of 12 facts found
How a case works
From invention disclosure to a reviewable application.
01
Interview
Interview the inventor
Discover the invention through conversation. Some questions surface the mechanism; others surface disclosure risks the inventor did not mention.
02
Research
Research the art
Plan a documented search, then chart each claim element against the references, passage by passage.
03
Draft
Draft claims and the application
Write independent and dependent claims with instant drafting checks, then a mock specification that supports them.
04
Revise
Get feedback and revise
Submit for a rubric evaluation with evidence for every point, revise, and resubmit. Improvement is part of completion.
05
Prosecute
Answer an office action
A simulated examiner rejects your claims using the case's references. Reply with amendments and arguments, and see what happens next.
06
Practice
Docket, interview, report
Calendar the action's deadlines exactly, interview the simulated examiner on a proposed amendment and record what was agreed, then report the action to the client and decide what prior art to disclose.
07
Plan
Plan the portfolio
Advise the client on foreign filing, a continuation and the budget, with the earlier disclosures from the interview accounted for.
Inside the lab
The work itself, step by step.
Drafting
Draft claims with checks as you type.
Write independent and dependent claims against the case's prior art. Drafting checks flag antecedent basis, relative terms, dependency errors and unsupported language while you work.
Submit for a rubric evaluation and every point comes back with the evidence for it: what earned it, what cost it, and where in your draft.
Claim draftingIllustration
Claims · draft 2
1. A robotic gripper comprising: a pair of fingers; a force sensor; and a controller configured to compare a measured grip force with the threshold and to update the threshold for an object class substantially after each grasp.
Antecedent basis"the threshold" has no earlier "a threshold"
Relative term"substantially" needs a standard in the spec
Rubric score78
Prosecution
Answer the examiner, and see what happens next.
A simulated examiner rejects your claims using the case's own references. Amend and argue in reply. Rejections you overcome are withdrawn; the rest go final, and you decide what to do.
Office action simulatorIllustration
Non-final office action · reply filed
Claims 1–4 · 35 U.S.C. 103over RG-P01 in view of RG-P02Withdrawn
Claim 3 · 35 U.S.C. 112(b)"substantially" is indefiniteWithdrawn
Notice of allowanceAmended claim 1 recites the class-based threshold update
Practice
Run the matter like a practitioner.
Docket every deadline exactly, interview the examiner on a proposed amendment and record what was agreed, report the action to the client, decide what prior art to disclose, and plan the portfolio.
Each case has a defined invention, an inventor who only knows what is in the case file, curated reference documents and a reviewed rubric. The AI makes it conversational; the ground truth stays fixed.
02
Feedback you can check
Scores come from published rubric rules, and every point cites what earned or cost it. AI suggestions are shown only when they quote your work accurately and cite real case material.
03
A mentor that teaches
Socratic, Coach, Reviewer and Examiner modes, with a hint ladder from a nudge to a worked explanation. It cites a fixed list of official sources and never drafts your claims for you.
04
Honest about what it is
Cases are synthetic. Feedback is educational, not legal advice; a score is not a patentability opinion; and completion is not a USPTO credential or CLE.
Four cases
From a foundation device to advanced chemistry.
MD-001 · Foundation · mechanical
Self-Locking Laptop Stand
A folding laptop stand that locks at each height. What actually makes it different, and what has the company already done with it?
RG-001 · Intermediate · robotics and control
Adaptive Robotic Gripper
A packing-line gripper that gets better with experience. Is the learning the invention, or is it ordinary force feedback?
AI-001 · Intermediate · AI and software
Edge Anomaly Detector
A vibration sensor that runs its model on the device. Eligibility, who contributed what, and claiming the technical improvement.
EC-001 · Advanced · chemistry and energy storage
Low-Temperature Electrolyte Additive
A little of one additive keeps cells working in the cold, and more works worse. Overlapping ranges, unexpected results, a genus with a failed member, and a university collaborator.
Every case is synthetic: the inventors, companies and references are fictional teaching material.
The course
Patent Drafting & Prosecution Practicum.
Sixteen modules, each with a worked example, a checklist and a quiz, and each ending with practice on a case. Module 1 is free.
01Role, professional responsibility, inventorship and confidentiality
02Conducting the inventor interview
03Invention decomposition and novelty hypothesis
04Patent landscape and search strategy
05Prior-art triage and dated references
06Claim foundations
07Dependencies, fallback embodiments and alternatives
08Eligibility, novelty, obviousness and 112 risk
09Specification, figures and enablement
10Assembling a mock nonprovisional application
11Examiner perspective and amendment tradeoffs
12Quality review, professional judgment and portfolio
13Professional practice: docketing, client reporting and workflow
14Examiner interviews
15Portfolio strategy: continuations, foreign filing and budgets
16Information disclosure statements
Pricing
Included in Wysebridge ONE, or on its own.
Best value
Wysebridge ONE
$697one payment
The Practicum to keep and the Practice Lab, plus Patent Bar, both IP law courses, unlimited MPEP notes and a year of Professional Plus.
The Practicum course, yours to keep
The Practice Lab renews with ONE: $59/yr after year one